Preservice Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Learning Obstacles in Shape and Space
Asian Research Journal of Mathematics,
The notion of shape and space is the building block for geometry reasoning. Accordingly, it is expected that those trained to teach would possess substantial content knowledge for teaching planar and spatial notions. This study investigated the level of content knowledge and sources of learning obstacles encountered by preservice teachers prior to their first practice teaching of shape and space. The study adopted a cross-sectional survey design involving 757 second-year preservice teachers from 12 colleges of education in Ghana. Data were collected through written responses to basic shape and space tasks. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively while qualitative data were analyzed thematically into matrix index. Participants’ content knowledge were categorized into declarative, conditional and procedural knowledge types. The result shows that participants were largely operating at moderate levels of declarative, procedural and conditional content knowledge. However, participants demonstrated higher procedural knowledge than declarative and conditional knowledge. Tasks on prisms and pyramids were more difficult for preservice teachers than those on angles, triangles and quadrilaterals. The learning obstacles encountered were mostly didactical followed by epistemological with few being ontogenetic. The study recommends that tutors should employ investigative didactic strategies to promote the three content knowledge types identified and to address the epistemological and ontogenetic obstacles in preservice teachers’ learning of shape and space.
- Declarative knowledge
- conditional knowledge
- procedural knowledge
- shape and space
- learning obstacles
How to Cite
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (). Teaching syllabus for Mathematics. Accra: CRDD. 2007; 1-6.
Armah RB, Cofie PO, Okpoti CA. The geometric thinking levels of pre-service teachers in Ghana. Higher Education Research. 2017;3:98-106. DOI: 10.11648/j.her.20170203.14
Institute of Education. Professional Board Meeting (Award Committee Meeting) Report on Colleges of Education Examination Results (3-year Diploma in Basic Education), University of Cape Coast; 2017.
Institute of Education. Three-year Diploma in Basic Education Syllabus. Cape Coast: University of Cape Coast; 2014.
Institute of Education. Chief examiner’s report on the 1995 three- year post-secondary teacher training college, Mathematics Examination. Cape Coast: University of Cape Coast; 1995.
Ministry of Education. Creative approaches (PD Guide for Tutors), Transforming Teacher Education and Learning (T-TEL). Professional Development Programme; 2015. Available:http://www.oer.t-tel.org.
Noto SM, Priatna N, Dahlan AJ. Analyzing learning obstacles on transformation Geometry. Journal of Physic, conference series 1157 of International conference on science and mathematics education. IOP publishing; 2019.
Gogoe M. Ghanaian pre-service teachers’ Geometric knowledge for teaching. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Department of Mathematics Education, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana; 2009.
Ball DL, Thames MH, Phelps G. Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it Special? Journal of Teacher Education. 2008;59(5):389-407.
Shulman S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher. 1986;15(2).
Alexander PA, Judy JE. The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research. 1988;58(4):375-404.
Cevirgen AE. Causal Relations among 12th Grade Students’ Geometry Knowledge, Spatial Ability, Gender and School Type. A doctoral thesis submitted to the graduate school of natural and applied sciences of Middle East Technical University; 2012.
Schneider M, Rittle-Johnson B, Star JR. Relations between conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and procedural flexibility in two samples differing in prior knowledge. Developmental Psychology. 2011;47(6):1525-1538. DOI: doi:Io.1037/aoo24997
Yilmaz I, Yalcin N. The relationship of procedural and declarative knowledge of science teacher candidates in newton’s laws of motion to understanding. American International Journal of Contemporary Research. 2012;2(3):50-56.
Aydin U, Ubuz B. Structural model of metacognition and knowledge of geometry. Learning and Individual Differences. 2010;20 (5):436-445.
Lauritzen P. Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematical functions. A Dissertation in Education, Humanities and Theology. Publications of University of Eastern Finland; 2012.
Ningsih EF, Retnowati E. Prior knowledge in mathematics learning. In SEMANTIK Conference of Mathematics Education (SEMANTIK 2019). Atlantis Press. 2020;61-66.
Fuadiah FE. Epistemological obstacles on mathematics learning in junior high school students: A study on the operations of integer material. Proceeding of International Conference On Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences 2015, Yogyakarta State University. 2015; ME-317.
Riastuti N, Mardiyana M, Pramudya I. Students’ errors in geometry viewed from Spatial Intelligence. International conference on Mathematics and Science Education, IOP conference Series: Journal of Physics Series. 2017;895:012029. DOI: 1088/1742-6596/895/1/012029.
Star JR, Stylianides GJ. Procedural and conceptual knowledge: Exploring the gap between knowledge type and knowledge quality. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education. 2013;13(2):169-181.
Haapalasa L, Kadijevich D. Two types of mathematics knowledge and their relations. Journal fur Mathemtik-Didaktik. 2000;21(2):139-157.
Brousseau G. Theory of didactical situation in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
Moru EK. Epistemological obstacles in coming to understand the limit of a function at undergraduate level: A case from the National University of Lesotho. International Journal of science and mathematics education. 2009;7:341-454.
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge; 2007.
Haj-Yahya A, Hershkowitz R. When visual and verbal representations meet the case of geometrical figures. In Lindmeier, A. M. & Heinze, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Kiel, Germany: PME. 2013;2:409-416.
Akayuure P, Asiedu-Addo SK., Alebna V. Investigating the effect of origami instruction on preservice teachers’ spatial ability and geometric knowledge for teaching. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. 2016;4(3):198-209. DOI:10.18404/ijemst.78424.
Abstract View: 83 times
PDF Download: 33 times