Exploring Concrete Teaching Strategies using the Mathematics Laboratory Method to Enhance Learner Achievements in Zambian Secondary Schools
Asian Research Journal of Mathematics,
Page 1-12
DOI:
10.9734/arjom/2022/v18i830392
Abstract
This study sought to investigate the effectiveness of the mathematics laboratory method in enhancing learner achievements in mathematics of Grade 12 pupils. The specific objectives of this study were to; investigate the extent to which the Mathematics Laboratory Method enhances Grade 12 academic performance in Mathematics, and to establish the challenges faced by Secondary Schools in establishing Mathematical laboratories. The study employed a mixed method approach, a concurrent triangulation design was used, with a sample size of 120 pupils and 12 teachers from the 3 selected secondary schools. Simple random sampling was used on the pupils and purposive sampling teaching was used to select the teachers. The control group and the experimental group were subjected to a pre-test where an independent sample T-test was used to test the hypothesis. The mean pre- test scores were 52% and 54% for the experimental and control group respectively. Further, statistical analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the pre-test results between the two groups. On the other hand, results for the post test, which was administered after the control group was taught using the traditional method of teaching and experimental group using the mathematics laboratory method showed a statistically significant difference. The mean score for the post-test rose to 63.97%% and 68.13% for the control and experimental group respectively. Pupils who were taught using the Mathematics Laboratory Method performed better than those who were taught using the Traditional Method of teaching. The study recommends the adoption of Mathematics Laboratory Method in Secondary Schools so as to enhance learner achievements in Mathematics.
Keywords:
- Teaching strategies
- mathematics
- thinking skills
- academic performance
How to Cite
References
Cockcroft WH. Mathematics counts. HM Stationery Office London; 1982.
Singh P, Teoh SH, Cheong TH, Rasid NSM, Kor LK, Nasir NAM. The use of problem-solving heuristics approach in enhancing STEM students development of mathematical thinking. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 2018;13(3):289-303.
Dewan HK. Building a better mathematics classroom. Voices of Teachers and Teacher Educators. 2016;1:6-18.
Kunwar R. Mathematics laboratory in school level education in Nepal: An overview. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). 2020;9(9):327-334.
Alshafey GAM, Aldosary SS. The reality of employing the mathematics lab and its relationship to developing geometrical proof skills among high school students; 2021.
Matika VT. An investigation into causes of high failure rate of pupils in Mathematics at O’level at Masvaure Secondary School in Mutare District Manicaland BUSE]; 2015.
Nyaumwe LJ. Developing Mathematics Learners’ Problem-Solving Skills through Cooperative Learning. Proceedings of the 19th Annual SAARMSTE Conference; 2011.
Ugada P, Gimba R, Abdulrahman M. Effects of Mathematics Laboratory Instruction on Students Geometry Achievement and Attitude among Senior Secondary School FCT Municipal Council; 2018.
Cicekci MA, Sadik F. Teachers' and Students' Opinions about Students' Attention Problems during the Lesson. Journal of Education and Learning. 2019;8(6):15-30.
Mushin I, Gardner R, Munro JM. Language matters in demonstrations of understanding in early years mathematics assessment. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2013;25(3):415-433.
[Record #27 is using a reference type undefined in this output style.]
Ado I, Nwosu S. Influence of Laboratory Method on Students’ Mathematical Creativity in Yenagoa Local Government Area of Bayelsa State. International Journal of Education and Practice. 2016;4(2):47-54.
Ogunkunle RA. Mathematics textbook development and learning under difficult circumstances in schools in nigeria. Development (ICMT-2014). 2014;377.
Brandon AF, All AC. Constructivism theory analysis and application to curricula. Nursing education perspectives. 2010;31(2):89-92.
Applefield JM, Huber R, Moallem M. Constructivism in theory and practice: Toward a better understanding. The High School Journal. 2000;84(2):35-53.
Schcolnik M, Kol S, Abarbanel J. Constructivism in theory and in practice. English teaching forum; 2006.
Creswell JW, Fetters MD, Ivankova NV. Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2004;2(1):7-12.
Radovan M, Makovec D. Relations between students’ motivation, and perceptions of the learning environment. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. 2015;5(2):115-138.
Ajewole TO, Adeyemi SB, Amossou TE, Alonge AS. Disposition of Nigerian Secondary School Students to E-Learning Technology during COVID-19 Lockdown. Journal of Innovation in Psychology, Education and Didactics. 2021;25(2):131-142.
Okigbo EC, Osuafor AM. Effect of using mathematics laboratory in teaching mathematics on the achievement of mathematics students. Educational Research and Reviews. 2008;3(8):257-261.
Maschietto M, Trouche L. Mathematics learning and tools from theoretical, historical and practical points of view: the productive notion of mathematics laboratories. ZDM. 2010;42(1):33-47.
Milton J, Ohira T. Mathematics as a laboratory tool. Springer; 2016.
Vos P. Assessment of applied mathematics and modelling: Using a laboratory-like environment. In Modelling and applications in mathematics education. Springer. 2007;441-448.
-
Abstract View: 72 times
PDF Download: 27 times
